Solved Examples

NCERT Solutions for Class 10 Maths Chapter 1: Real Numbers — Complete Guide with Step-by-Step Solutions

Complete step-by-step solutions for every exercise — Euclid's division lemma, Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, irrationality proofs, and decimal expansions.

CBSEClass 10
The SparkEd Authors (IITian & Googler)15 March 202655 min read
NCERT Solutions for Class 10 Maths Chapter 1 Real Numbers with Euclid's Division Lemma and HCF-LCM problems.

Why Real Numbers Is the Perfect Chapter to Start With

Chapter 1 of NCERT Class 10 Maths — Real Numbers — sets the tone for your entire board exam preparation. This chapter revisits number theory concepts from Class 9 and takes them to a much deeper level. You will learn Euclid's Division Lemma, the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, how to prove that numbers like 2\sqrt{2} and 3\sqrt{3} are irrational, and how to determine the nature of decimal expansions of rational numbers.

From an exam perspective, this chapter is a gift. The question patterns are highly predictable: you will almost always get one HCF problem using Euclid's algorithm, one irrationality proof, and one decimal expansion question. If you master the techniques in this guide, you can comfortably secure full marks from this chapter.

The chapter has 4 exercises with a total of roughly 15 problems:
- Exercise 1.1 (3 problems): Euclid's Division Lemma and Algorithm
- Exercise 1.2 (7 problems): Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, HCF and LCM via prime factorisation
- Exercise 1.3 (3 problems): Proving irrationality using contradiction
- Exercise 1.4 (3 problems): Decimal expansions of rational numbers

This chapter typically carries 3-6 marks in the CBSE board exam and is considered one of the most scoring chapters because the algorithms and proof structures are completely systematic. Let's dive into every concept and every problem, step by step.

Key Concepts and Theorems You Must Know

Before we solve the exercises, let's build a rock-solid foundation of the core concepts. Understanding why each theorem works is just as important as knowing how to apply it.

Euclid's Division Lemma

Statement: For any two positive integers aa and bb, there exist unique integers qq (quotient) and rr (remainder) such that:

a=bq+r,0r<ba = bq + r, \quad 0 \le r < b

This is simply the mathematical statement of what happens when you divide one number by another. For example, when you divide 1717 by 55: 17=5×3+217 = 5 \times 3 + 2. Here a=17a = 17, b=5b = 5, q=3q = 3, r=2r = 2, and indeed 02<50 \le 2 < 5.

The key insight is the uniqueness of qq and rr. Given any pair (a,b)(a, b), there is exactly one pair (q,r)(q, r) satisfying the conditions. This uniqueness is what makes Euclid's Division Algorithm work reliably every time.

Euclid's Division Algorithm for HCF

The algorithm uses the lemma repeatedly to find the HCF of two numbers:

Step 1: Apply the division lemma to aa and bb (where a>ba > b): a=bq1+r1a = bq_1 + r_1.
Step 2: If r1=0r_1 = 0, then HCF =b= b. Stop.
Step 3: If r10r_1 \neq 0, apply the lemma to bb and r1r_1: b=r1q2+r2b = r_1 q_2 + r_2.
Step 4: Continue this process until the remainder becomes 00. The last non-zero remainder (i.e., the last divisor) is the HCF.

Why does this work? At each step, HCF(a,b)=HCF(b,r1)=HCF(r1,r2)=\text{HCF}(a, b) = \text{HCF}(b, r_1) = \text{HCF}(r_1, r_2) = \ldots The remainders keep decreasing (r1>r2>r3>0r_1 > r_2 > r_3 > \ldots \ge 0), so the process must terminate. When the remainder hits 00, the previous remainder is the HCF.

The beauty of this algorithm is that it works for any pair of positive integers, no matter how large, without needing to find prime factorisations.

Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic

Statement: Every composite number can be expressed (factorised) as a product of primes, and this factorisation is unique, apart from the order in which the prime factors occur.

For example:
- 12=22×312 = 2^2 \times 3
- 180=22×32×5180 = 2^2 \times 3^2 \times 5
- 17=1717 = 17 (prime numbers are their own factorisation)

This theorem is the foundation for finding HCF and LCM using prime factorisation:
- HCF = product of the smallest power of each common prime factor
- LCM = product of the greatest power of each prime factor that appears in either number

Important relationship:

HCF(a,b)×LCM(a,b)=a×b\text{HCF}(a, b) \times \text{LCM}(a, b) = a \times b

This identity is extremely useful for verification and for finding one quantity when the other three are known.

Irrational Numbers and Proof by Contradiction

A number that cannot be written in the form pq\frac{p}{q} (where pp and qq are integers with q0q \neq 0) is called irrational. Examples include 2\sqrt{2}, 3\sqrt{3}, 5\sqrt{5}, π\pi, and ee.

The standard proof technique for showing a number is irrational is proof by contradiction (also called reductio ad absurdum):
1. Assume the number is rational (i.e., it can be written as pq\frac{p}{q} in lowest terms).
2. Derive a logical consequence that contradicts the assumption.
3. Conclude that the original assumption was wrong, so the number must be irrational.

A critical lemma used in these proofs: **If a prime pp divides a2a^2, then pp divides aa.** This follows from the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic.

Decimal Expansions of Rational Numbers

The decimal expansion of a rational number pq\frac{p}{q} (in lowest terms) is:
- Terminating if and only if qq is of the form 2m×5n2^m \times 5^n (where m,nm, n are non-negative integers).
- Non-terminating repeating if qq has any prime factor other than 22 or 55.

To convert a terminating decimal to a fraction, multiply numerator and denominator to make the denominator a power of 1010. For example:

78=723=7×5323×53=8751000=0.875\frac{7}{8} = \frac{7}{2^3} = \frac{7 \times 5^3}{2^3 \times 5^3} = \frac{875}{1000} = 0.875

This concept connects to the Fundamental Theorem because the primality of the denominator's factors determines the decimal behaviour.

Exercise 1.1 — Euclid's Division Lemma (All Problems Solved)

Exercise 1.1 has 3 problems that test your ability to apply Euclid's Division Algorithm. These problems are straightforward once you master the procedure — just keep dividing until the remainder is zero.

Problem 1: Use Euclid's division algorithm to find the HCF of 135 and 225

Solution:
We need HCF(135, 225). Since 225>135225 > 135, we start with a=225a = 225 and b=135b = 135.

Step 1: Apply the division lemma:

225=135×1+90225 = 135 \times 1 + 90

Remainder =900= 90 \neq 0, so continue.

Step 2: Now apply to 135135 and 9090:

135=90×1+45135 = 90 \times 1 + 45

Remainder =450= 45 \neq 0, so continue.

Step 3: Apply to 9090 and 4545:

90=45×2+090 = 45 \times 2 + 0

Remainder =0= 0. Stop here.

The last non-zero remainder (equivalently, the last divisor) is 4545.

Answer: HCF(135,225)=45\text{HCF}(135, 225) = 45

Verification: 135=45×3135 = 45 \times 3 and 225=45×5225 = 45 \times 5. Since gcd(3,5)=1\gcd(3, 5) = 1, confirmed that 4545 is indeed the HCF. \checkmark

Problem 2: Use Euclid's division algorithm to find the HCF of 196 and 38220

Solution:
Since 38220>19638220 > 196, we start with a=38220a = 38220 and b=196b = 196.

Step 1: Apply the division lemma:

38220=196×195+038220 = 196 \times 195 + 0

The remainder is 00 in the very first step! This means 196196 divides 3822038220 exactly.

Answer: HCF(196,38220)=196\text{HCF}(196, 38220) = 196

Verification: 38220÷196=19538220 \div 196 = 195 exactly, so 196196 is indeed a factor of 3822038220. And since 196196 divides itself, the HCF is 196196. \checkmark

Key takeaway: When the first division gives remainder 00, the smaller number is itself the HCF. This happens whenever one number is a multiple of the other.

Problem 3: Use Euclid's division algorithm to find the HCF of 867 and 255

Solution:
Since 867>255867 > 255, start with a=867a = 867 and b=255b = 255.

Step 1:

867=255×3+102867 = 255 \times 3 + 102

Remainder =1020= 102 \neq 0.

Step 2:

255=102×2+51255 = 102 \times 2 + 51

Remainder =510= 51 \neq 0.

Step 3:

102=51×2+0102 = 51 \times 2 + 0

Remainder =0= 0. Stop.

Answer: HCF(867,255)=51\text{HCF}(867, 255) = 51

Verification: 867=51×17867 = 51 \times 17 and 255=51×5255 = 51 \times 5. Since gcd(17,5)=1\gcd(17, 5) = 1, confirmed. \checkmark

Additional Practice: HCF of 4052 and 12576

Solution (Board Exam Style):
Since 12576>405212576 > 4052:

Step 1: 12576=4052×3+42012576 = 4052 \times 3 + 420
Step 2: 4052=420×9+2724052 = 420 \times 9 + 272
Step 3: 420=272×1+148420 = 272 \times 1 + 148
Step 4: 272=148×1+124272 = 148 \times 1 + 124
Step 5: 148=124×1+24148 = 124 \times 1 + 24
Step 6: 124=24×5+4124 = 24 \times 5 + 4
Step 7: 24=4×6+024 = 4 \times 6 + 0

Answer: HCF(4052,12576)=4\text{HCF}(4052, 12576) = 4

Note: This problem requires more steps, which is typical for larger numbers. The algorithm always terminates because the remainders form a strictly decreasing sequence: 420>272>148>124>24>4>0420 > 272 > 148 > 124 > 24 > 4 > 0.

Practice this topic on SparkEd — free visual solutions and AI coaching

Try Free

Exercise 1.1 — Extended Application Problems

Euclid's Division Lemma is not just for finding HCF. It appears in various application-type problems in board exams. Here are additional solved examples that build on the same concept.

Application: Show that every positive even integer is of the form 2q

Solution:
Let aa be any positive integer. By Euclid's Division Lemma with divisor b=2b = 2:

a=2q+r,0r<2a = 2q + r, \quad 0 \le r < 2

So r=0r = 0 or r=1r = 1.
- If r=0r = 0: a=2qa = 2q — this is even.
- If r=1r = 1: a=2q+1a = 2q + 1 — this is odd.

Therefore, every positive even integer is of the form 2q2q, and every positive odd integer is of the form 2q+12q + 1, for some non-negative integer qq. \square

Application: Show that any positive odd integer is of the form 4q + 1 or 4q + 3

Solution:
Let aa be any positive integer. Applying Euclid's Division Lemma with b=4b = 4:

a=4q+r,0r<4a = 4q + r, \quad 0 \le r < 4

So r{0,1,2,3}r \in \{0, 1, 2, 3\}, giving us four forms:
- a=4qa = 4q (even)
- a=4q+1a = 4q + 1 (odd)
- a=4q+2=2(2q+1)a = 4q + 2 = 2(2q + 1) (even)
- a=4q+3a = 4q + 3 (odd)

The odd cases are 4q+14q + 1 and 4q+34q + 3. Therefore, any positive odd integer is of the form 4q+14q + 1 or 4q+34q + 3. \square

Board exam tip: This type of problem can appear as a 2-mark or 3-mark question. The key is to apply Euclid's Lemma with the appropriate divisor and then identify which remainders give odd values.

Application: Show that the square of any positive integer is of the form 3m or 3m + 1

Solution:
Let aa be any positive integer. By Euclid's Division Lemma with b=3b = 3:

a=3q+r,r{0,1,2}a = 3q + r, \quad r \in \{0, 1, 2\}

Case 1: a=3q    a2=9q2=3(3q2)=3ma = 3q \implies a^2 = 9q^2 = 3(3q^2) = 3m where m=3q2m = 3q^2.

Case 2: a=3q+1    a2=9q2+6q+1=3(3q2+2q)+1=3m+1a = 3q + 1 \implies a^2 = 9q^2 + 6q + 1 = 3(3q^2 + 2q) + 1 = 3m + 1 where m=3q2+2qm = 3q^2 + 2q.

Case 3: a=3q+2    a2=9q2+12q+4=3(3q2+4q+1)+1=3m+1a = 3q + 2 \implies a^2 = 9q^2 + 12q + 4 = 3(3q^2 + 4q + 1) + 1 = 3m + 1 where m=3q2+4q+1m = 3q^2 + 4q + 1.

In all cases, a2a^2 is either of the form 3m3m or 3m+13m + 1. \square

Observation: The square of any integer is never of the form 3m+23m + 2. This is a useful result for irrationality proofs involving 3\sqrt{3}.

Exercise 1.2 — Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic (All Problems Solved)

Exercise 1.2 is the longest exercise in this chapter with 7 problems. It tests your ability to find prime factorisations and use them to compute HCF and LCM. The relationship HCF×LCM=a×b\text{HCF} \times \text{LCM} = a \times b is used for verification in every problem.

Problem 1: Express each as a product of primes — 140, 156, 3825, 5005, 7429

Solution:

(i) 140=2×70=2×2×35=2×2×5×7140 = 2 \times 70 = 2 \times 2 \times 35 = 2 \times 2 \times 5 \times 7

140=22×5×7140 = 2^2 \times 5 \times 7

(ii) 156=2×78=2×2×39=2×2×3×13156 = 2 \times 78 = 2 \times 2 \times 39 = 2 \times 2 \times 3 \times 13

156=22×3×13156 = 2^2 \times 3 \times 13

(iii) 3825=3×1275=3×3×425=32×5×85=32×5×5×173825 = 3 \times 1275 = 3 \times 3 \times 425 = 3^2 \times 5 \times 85 = 3^2 \times 5 \times 5 \times 17

3825=32×52×173825 = 3^2 \times 5^2 \times 17

(iv) 5005=5×1001=5×7×143=5×7×11×135005 = 5 \times 1001 = 5 \times 7 \times 143 = 5 \times 7 \times 11 \times 13

5005=5×7×11×135005 = 5 \times 7 \times 11 \times 13

(v) 7429=17×437=17×19×237429 = 17 \times 437 = 17 \times 19 \times 23

7429=17×19×237429 = 17 \times 19 \times 23

Tip for board exams: Use the factor tree method or repeated division by primes. Start with the smallest prime that divides the number.

Problem 2: Find LCM and HCF of 26 and 91, and verify the relationship

Solution:
Prime factorisations:

26=2×1326 = 2 \times 13

91=7×1391 = 7 \times 13

HCF = product of common prime factors with lowest powers =13= 13

LCM = product of all prime factors with highest powers =2×7×13=182= 2 \times 7 \times 13 = 182

Verification: HCF×LCM=13×182=2366\text{HCF} \times \text{LCM} = 13 \times 182 = 2366
a×b=26×91=2366a \times b = 26 \times 91 = 2366 \checkmark

Problem 2 (continued): Find LCM and HCF of 510 and 92

Solution:
Prime factorisations:

510=2×3×5×17510 = 2 \times 3 \times 5 \times 17

92=22×2392 = 2^2 \times 23

HCF =2= 2 (the only common prime factor)

LCM =22×3×5×17×23=23460= 2^2 \times 3 \times 5 \times 17 \times 23 = 23460

Verification: 2×23460=46920=510×922 \times 23460 = 46920 = 510 \times 92 \checkmark

Problem 2 (continued): Find LCM and HCF of 336 and 54

Solution:
Prime factorisations:

336=24×3×7336 = 2^4 \times 3 \times 7

54=2×3354 = 2 \times 3^3

HCF =21×31=6= 2^1 \times 3^1 = 6 (smallest powers of common primes 22 and 33)

LCM =24×33×7=16×27×7=3024= 2^4 \times 3^3 \times 7 = 16 \times 27 \times 7 = 3024 (highest powers of all primes)

Verification: 6×3024=18144=336×546 \times 3024 = 18144 = 336 \times 54 \checkmark

Problem 3: Find LCM and HCF of three numbers — 12, 15, 21

Solution:
Prime factorisations:

12=22×312 = 2^2 \times 3

15=3×515 = 3 \times 5

21=3×721 = 3 \times 7

HCF =3= 3 (the only prime common to all three, with minimum power 11)

LCM =22×3×5×7=4×3×5×7=420= 2^2 \times 3 \times 5 \times 7 = 4 \times 3 \times 5 \times 7 = 420

Note: For three numbers, the relationship HCF×LCM=a×b×c\text{HCF} \times \text{LCM} = a \times b \times c does not hold in general. That identity only works for two numbers. You can verify: 3×420=12603 \times 420 = 1260, but 12×15×21=378012 \times 15 \times 21 = 3780.

Problem 4: Given HCF(306, 657) = 9, find LCM(306, 657)

Solution:
Using the fundamental relationship for two numbers:

HCF(a,b)×LCM(a,b)=a×b\text{HCF}(a, b) \times \text{LCM}(a, b) = a \times b

9×LCM=306×6579 \times \text{LCM} = 306 \times 657

LCM=306×6579=2010429=22338\text{LCM} = \frac{306 \times 657}{9} = \frac{201042}{9} = 22338

Answer: LCM(306,657)=22338\text{LCM}(306, 657) = 22338

Problem 5: Check whether 6ⁿ can end with digit 0

Solution:
For a number to end with digit 00, it must be divisible by 10=2×510 = 2 \times 5. In other words, both 22 and 55 must appear in its prime factorisation.

Now, 6n=(2×3)n=2n×3n6^n = (2 \times 3)^n = 2^n \times 3^n.

The prime factorisation of 6n6^n contains only the primes 22 and 33. The prime 55 never appears.

By the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, since the prime factorisation is unique, 55 cannot be a factor of 6n6^n.

Therefore, 6n6^n cannot end with the digit 00 for any natural number nn. \square

Problem 6: Explain why 7 × 11 × 13 + 13 and 7 × 6 × 5 × 4 × 3 × 2 × 1 + 5 are composite

Solution:

(i) 7×11×13+13=13(7×11+1)=13×78=13×2×3×13=2×3×1327 \times 11 \times 13 + 13 = 13(7 \times 11 + 1) = 13 \times 78 = 13 \times 2 \times 3 \times 13 = 2 \times 3 \times 13^2

Since this number has factors other than 11 and itself, it is composite.

(ii) 7×6×5×4×3×2×1+5=5040+5=5(1008+1)=5×10097 \times 6 \times 5 \times 4 \times 3 \times 2 \times 1 + 5 = 5040 + 5 = 5(1008 + 1) = 5 \times 1009

Since 5045=5×10095045 = 5 \times 1009 has factors other than 11 and itself, it is composite.

Key insight: Taking out the common factor is the trick. In (i), 1313 is common; in (ii), 55 is common.

Problem 7: A rectangular field 60 m by 50 m — find maximum length of wooden planks for fencing

Solution:
We need to find the maximum length of planks that can be laid along both the 6060 m side and the 5050 m side without cutting. This means the plank length must divide both 6060 and 5050 — i.e., we need HCF(60,50)\text{HCF}(60, 50).

60=22×3×560 = 2^2 \times 3 \times 5

50=2×5250 = 2 \times 5^2

HCF(60,50)=2×5=10\text{HCF}(60, 50) = 2 \times 5 = 10

Answer: The maximum length of each plank is 1010 m.

Number of planks needed: along the 6060 m side =6= 6, along the 5050 m side =5= 5, total =2(6+5)=22= 2(6 + 5) = 22 planks (for the full perimeter).

Understanding Prime Factorisation — A Deeper Look

The Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic is more profound than it might first appear. Let's explore some of its consequences and applications that help with NCERT problems.

The theorem says that every integer greater than 11 either IS a prime or can be written as a unique product of primes. This uniqueness is the crucial part — there is exactly one way to factorise any number into primes (up to reordering).

Application to HCF and LCM:
When we write two numbers in their prime factorised form:

a=p1α1×p2α2××pkαka = p_1^{\alpha_1} \times p_2^{\alpha_2} \times \ldots \times p_k^{\alpha_k}

b=p1β1×p2β2××pkβkb = p_1^{\beta_1} \times p_2^{\beta_2} \times \ldots \times p_k^{\beta_k}

(where some exponents may be 00)

Then:

HCF(a,b)=p1min(α1,β1)×p2min(α2,β2)×\text{HCF}(a, b) = p_1^{\min(\alpha_1, \beta_1)} \times p_2^{\min(\alpha_2, \beta_2)} \times \ldots

LCM(a,b)=p1max(α1,β1)×p2max(α2,β2)×\text{LCM}(a, b) = p_1^{\max(\alpha_1, \beta_1)} \times p_2^{\max(\alpha_2, \beta_2)} \times \ldots

Since min(x,y)+max(x,y)=x+y\min(x, y) + \max(x, y) = x + y for any two numbers, adding the exponents gives:

HCF(a,b)×LCM(a,b)=p1α1+β1×p2α2+β2×=a×b\text{HCF}(a, b) \times \text{LCM}(a, b) = p_1^{\alpha_1 + \beta_1} \times p_2^{\alpha_2 + \beta_2} \times \ldots = a \times b

This is why the HCF ×\times LCM == product identity works!

Common exam pitfall: Students often forget that HCF uses the minimum power and LCM uses the maximum power. A helpful mnemonic: HCF is the "humble" (smaller) one, LCM is the "large" one.

Exercise 1.3 — Irrationality Proofs (All Problems Solved)

Exercise 1.3 is where many students feel intimidated, but the proofs follow a completely standard template. Once you learn the structure, you can prove that any expression involving p\sqrt{p} (where pp is prime) is irrational.

The key tool is a lemma from the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic:

Lemma: If pp is a prime number and pp divides a2a^2, then pp divides aa.

Proof of Lemma: Let a=p1e1×p2e2××pkeka = p_1^{e_1} \times p_2^{e_2} \times \ldots \times p_k^{e_k} be the prime factorisation of aa. Then a2=p12e1×p22e2××pk2eka^2 = p_1^{2e_1} \times p_2^{2e_2} \times \ldots \times p_k^{2e_k}. If the prime pp divides a2a^2, then by the uniqueness of prime factorisation, pp must be one of p1,p2,,pkp_1, p_2, \ldots, p_k. But then pp also divides aa. \square

Problem 1: Prove that √5 is irrational

Solution:
Assume, for the sake of contradiction, that 5\sqrt{5} is rational.

Then we can write 5=pq\sqrt{5} = \frac{p}{q}, where pp and qq are co-prime integers (i.e., gcd(p,q)=1\gcd(p, q) = 1) and q0q \neq 0.

Squaring both sides:

5=p2q25 = \frac{p^2}{q^2}

p2=5q2(1)p^2 = 5q^2 \quad \cdots (1)

This tells us 55 divides p2p^2. Since 55 is prime, by our lemma, 55 divides pp.

Let p=5kp = 5k for some integer kk. Substituting in (1):

(5k)2=5q2(5k)^2 = 5q^2

25k2=5q225k^2 = 5q^2

q2=5k2(2)q^2 = 5k^2 \quad \cdots (2)

From (2), 55 divides q2q^2, so 55 divides qq.

But now **both pp and qq are divisible by 55**, which contradicts our assumption that pp and qq are co-prime.

Therefore, our assumption is wrong, and 5\sqrt{5} is irrational. \square

Template observation: This exact proof works for 2\sqrt{2}, 3\sqrt{3}, 7\sqrt{7}, or any p\sqrt{p} where pp is prime — just replace 55 with the relevant prime.

Problem 2: Prove that 3 + 2√5 is irrational

Solution:
Assume, for contradiction, that 3+253 + 2\sqrt{5} is rational.

Then 3+25=ab3 + 2\sqrt{5} = \frac{a}{b} for some co-prime integers aa and bb with b0b \neq 0.

Rearranging:

25=ab3=a3bb2\sqrt{5} = \frac{a}{b} - 3 = \frac{a - 3b}{b}

5=a3b2b\sqrt{5} = \frac{a - 3b}{2b}

Now, since aa and bb are integers, the right side a3b2b\frac{a - 3b}{2b} is a rational number.

But we have already proved (in Problem 1) that 5\sqrt{5} is irrational.

A rational number cannot equal an irrational number. This is a contradiction.

Therefore, 3+253 + 2\sqrt{5} is irrational. \square

Key technique: This is the "isolation" method — isolate the irrational part (5\sqrt{5}) on one side and show the other side is rational, giving a contradiction.

Problem 3: Prove that 1/√2 is irrational

Solution:
Assume, for contradiction, that 12\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} is rational.

Then 12=ab\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} = \frac{a}{b} for some co-prime integers a,ba, b with b0b \neq 0.

Rearranging:

2=ba\sqrt{2} = \frac{b}{a}

Since aa and bb are integers with a0a \neq 0, the right side is rational.

But 2\sqrt{2} is irrational (can be proved exactly like 5\sqrt{5} in Problem 1, replacing 55 with 22).

This contradiction means 12\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} is irrational. \square

Additional Practice: Prove that √2 is irrational

Solution (Full proof — this is the most commonly asked version in board exams):

Assume 2\sqrt{2} is rational. Then 2=pq\sqrt{2} = \frac{p}{q}, where gcd(p,q)=1\gcd(p, q) = 1.

Squaring: p2=2q2(1)p^2 = 2q^2 \quad \cdots (1)

So 22 divides p2    2p^2 \implies 2 divides pp. Let p=2mp = 2m.

Substituting in (1): 4m2=2q2    q2=2m24m^2 = 2q^2 \implies q^2 = 2m^2

So 22 divides q2    2q^2 \implies 2 divides qq.

But both pp and qq are even, contradicting gcd(p,q)=1\gcd(p, q) = 1.

Therefore, 2\sqrt{2} is irrational. \square

Additional Practice: Prove that √3 is irrational

Solution:
Assume 3=pq\sqrt{3} = \frac{p}{q} with gcd(p,q)=1\gcd(p, q) = 1.

p2=3q2    3p2    3pp^2 = 3q^2 \implies 3 | p^2 \implies 3 | p. Let p=3mp = 3m.

9m2=3q2    q2=3m2    3q2    3q9m^2 = 3q^2 \implies q^2 = 3m^2 \implies 3 | q^2 \implies 3 | q.

Both divisible by 33, contradicting co-primality. Hence 3\sqrt{3} is irrational. \square

Additional Practice: Prove that 5 + 3√2 is irrational

Solution:
Assume 5+32=ab5 + 3\sqrt{2} = \frac{a}{b} with gcd(a,b)=1\gcd(a, b) = 1.

2=a5b3b\sqrt{2} = \frac{a - 5b}{3b}

The right side is rational, but 2\sqrt{2} is irrational. Contradiction.

Therefore, 5+325 + 3\sqrt{2} is irrational. \square

The Structure of Irrationality Proofs — A Template

Every irrationality proof in NCERT Class 10 follows one of two templates. Master these and you can handle any variant the examiner throws at you.

**Template 1: Proving p\sqrt{p} is irrational (where pp is prime)**
1. Assume p=ab\sqrt{p} = \frac{a}{b} with gcd(a,b)=1\gcd(a, b) = 1.
2. Square both sides: a2=pb2a^2 = pb^2.
3. Conclude pap | a. Write a=pka = pk.
4. Substitute: p2k2=pb2    b2=pk2p^2k^2 = pb^2 \implies b^2 = pk^2.
5. Conclude pbp | b.
6. Contradiction: both aa and bb are divisible by pp, but gcd(a,b)=1\gcd(a, b) = 1.

**Template 2: Proving m+npm + n\sqrt{p} is irrational**
1. Assume it is rational, equal to ab\frac{a}{b}.
2. Isolate p\sqrt{p}: p=ambnb\sqrt{p} = \frac{a - mb}{nb}, which is rational.
3. But p\sqrt{p} is irrational (proved using Template 1).
4. Contradiction. Hence m+npm + n\sqrt{p} is irrational.

Board exam tip: In the proof of p\sqrt{p} being irrational, always state the lemma "If pp divides a2a^2, then pp divides aa" explicitly. Some examiners deduct marks if you use this fact without stating it.

Exercise 1.4 — Decimal Expansions of Rational Numbers (All Problems Solved)

Exercise 1.4 tests whether you can determine if a rational number has a terminating or non-terminating repeating decimal expansion. The rule is simple but must be applied carefully.

Problem 1: Without actual division, state whether the following have terminating or non-terminating repeating decimals

The Rule: pq\frac{p}{q} (in lowest terms) has a terminating decimal     \iff q=2m×5nq = 2^m \times 5^n (for non-negative integers m,nm, n).

(i) 133125\frac{13}{3125}: Here 3125=55=20×553125 = 5^5 = 2^0 \times 5^5. Since the denominator is of the form 2m×5n2^m \times 5^n, the decimal is terminating.

133125=13×2555×25=13×32105=416100000=0.00416\frac{13}{3125} = \frac{13 \times 2^5}{5^5 \times 2^5} = \frac{13 \times 32}{10^5} = \frac{416}{100000} = 0.00416

(ii) 178\frac{17}{8}: Here 8=23=23×508 = 2^3 = 2^3 \times 5^0. Terminating.

178=17×5323×53=17×1251000=21251000=2.125\frac{17}{8} = \frac{17 \times 5^3}{2^3 \times 5^3} = \frac{17 \times 125}{1000} = \frac{2125}{1000} = 2.125

(iii) 64455\frac{64}{455}: First reduce: gcd(64,455)=1\gcd(64, 455) = 1 (since 64=2664 = 2^6 and 455=5×7×13455 = 5 \times 7 \times 13). The denominator has prime factors 5,7,135, 7, 13. Since 77 and 1313 are present (not just 22s and 55s), the decimal is non-terminating repeating.

(iv) 151600\frac{15}{1600}: Simplify: 151600=3320\frac{15}{1600} = \frac{3}{320}. Now 320=26×5320 = 2^6 \times 5. Since 320=26×51320 = 2^6 \times 5^1, the decimal is terminating.

151600=15×531600×53=15×125200000=1875200000=0.009375\frac{15}{1600} = \frac{15 \times 5^3}{1600 \times 5^3} = \frac{15 \times 125}{200000} = \frac{1875}{200000} = 0.009375

Problem 1 (continued): More fractions to classify

(v) 29343\frac{29}{343}: Here 343=73343 = 7^3. The denominator contains a prime factor (77) other than 22 or 55. So the decimal is non-terminating repeating.

(vi) 2323×52\frac{23}{2^3 \times 5^2}: The denominator is already in the form 2m×5n2^m \times 5^n with m=3m = 3, n=2n = 2. Terminating.

2323×52=23200=23×5200×5=1151000=0.115\frac{23}{2^3 \times 5^2} = \frac{23}{200} = \frac{23 \times 5}{200 \times 5} = \frac{115}{1000} = 0.115

(vii) 12922×57×75\frac{129}{2^2 \times 5^7 \times 7^5}: The denominator has factor 757^5. Non-terminating repeating.

(viii) 615\frac{6}{15}: Simplify first! 615=25\frac{6}{15} = \frac{2}{5}. Denominator =5=20×51= 5 = 2^0 \times 5^1. Terminating.

615=25=0.4\frac{6}{15} = \frac{2}{5} = 0.4

Critical reminder: Always simplify the fraction to lowest terms first before checking the denominator. If you skip this step, you might incorrectly classify fractions like 615\frac{6}{15} (which simplifies to 25\frac{2}{5}, terminating) or 1421\frac{14}{21} (which simplifies to 23\frac{2}{3}, non-terminating).

Problem 2: Write down the decimal expansions of the terminating fractions from Problem 1

Solution:
For each terminating fraction, we convert the denominator to a power of 1010 by multiplying both numerator and denominator by the appropriate factor of 22 or 55:

(i) 133125=13×32100000=416100000=0.00416\frac{13}{3125} = \frac{13 \times 32}{100000} = \frac{416}{100000} = 0.00416

(ii) 178=17×1251000=21251000=2.125\frac{17}{8} = \frac{17 \times 125}{1000} = \frac{2125}{1000} = 2.125

(iv) 151600=3320=3×3125320×3125=93751000000=0.009375\frac{15}{1600} = \frac{3}{320} = \frac{3 \times 3125}{320 \times 3125} = \frac{9375}{1000000} = 0.009375

(vi) 23200=23×51000=1151000=0.115\frac{23}{200} = \frac{23 \times 5}{1000} = \frac{115}{1000} = 0.115

(viii) 615=25=410=0.4\frac{6}{15} = \frac{2}{5} = \frac{4}{10} = 0.4

Method: To make the denominator a power of 10=2×510 = 2 \times 5, check which prime is "missing" or has a smaller exponent. If denominator is 2a×5b2^a \times 5^b, multiply by 2max(a,b)a×5max(a,b)b2^{\max(a,b)-a} \times 5^{\max(a,b)-b} to get 10max(a,b)10^{\max(a,b)}.

Problem 3: Express the following in p/q form

Solution:

(i) 0.6=0.6660.\overline{6} = 0.666\ldots

Let x=0.666x = 0.666\ldots
10x=6.66610x = 6.666\ldots
10xx=610x - x = 6
9x=69x = 6
x=69=23x = \frac{6}{9} = \frac{2}{3}

(ii) 0.47=0.47770.4\overline{7} = 0.4777\ldots

Let x=0.4777x = 0.4777\ldots
10x=4.77710x = 4.777\ldots
100x=47.777100x = 47.777\ldots
100x10x=47.7774.777=43100x - 10x = 47.777\ldots - 4.777\ldots = 43
90x=4390x = 43
x=4390x = \frac{43}{90}

(iii) 0.001=0.0010010010.\overline{001} = 0.001001001\ldots

Let x=0.001001x = 0.001001\ldots
1000x=1.0010011000x = 1.001001\ldots
1000xx=11000x - x = 1
999x=1999x = 1
x=1999x = \frac{1}{999}

Technique: Multiply by 10k10^k where kk is the number of repeating digits, then subtract to eliminate the repeating part.

Converting Repeating Decimals — Extended Examples

Repeating decimals are a common area where students lose marks due to algebraic errors. Let's work through a few more examples to build confidence.

Example 1: Convert 0.12=0.1212120.\overline{12} = 0.121212\ldots to pq\frac{p}{q}.

Let x=0.121212x = 0.121212\ldots
100x=12.121212100x = 12.121212\ldots
100xx=12100x - x = 12
99x=1299x = 12
x=1299=433x = \frac{12}{99} = \frac{4}{33}

Example 2: Convert 2.35=2.3535352.\overline{35} = 2.353535\ldots to pq\frac{p}{q}.

Let x=2.353535x = 2.353535\ldots
100x=235.3535100x = 235.3535\ldots
100xx=233100x - x = 233
99x=23399x = 233
x=23399x = \frac{233}{99}

Example 3: Convert 0.123=0.12323230.1\overline{23} = 0.1232323\ldots to pq\frac{p}{q}.

Let x=0.123232323x = 0.123232323\ldots
10x=1.2323232310x = 1.23232323\ldots
1000x=123.2323231000x = 123.232323\ldots
1000x10x=1221000x - 10x = 122
990x=122990x = 122
x=122990=61495x = \frac{122}{990} = \frac{61}{495}

General rule: If there are kk non-repeating digits after the decimal point and mm repeating digits, multiply by 10k+m10^{k+m} and 10k10^k, then subtract.

Common Mistakes Students Make in Real Numbers

Here are the most frequent errors that cost students marks in board exams. Study these carefully and make sure you don't fall into these traps:

1. Not writing the division lemma equation properly:
* Mistake: Jumping straight to the answer without showing a=bq+ra = bq + r at each step.
* Fix: Write out every step explicitly: 225=135×1+90225 = 135 \times 1 + 90, then 135=90×1+45135 = 90 \times 1 + 45, etc. Examiners award marks for each step.

2. Confusing HCF and LCM formulas:
* Mistake: Using maximum powers for HCF or minimum powers for LCM.
* Fix: HCF = product of common primes with smallest powers. LCM = product of all primes with largest powers. Remember: HCF is the "humble" one.

3. Not reducing fractions to lowest terms:
* Mistake: Checking 615\frac{6}{15} and seeing that 15=3×515 = 3 \times 5 has a factor of 33, then concluding it's non-terminating.
* Fix: Always simplify first. 615=25\frac{6}{15} = \frac{2}{5}, and 5=515 = 5^1, so it's terminating.

4. Forgetting to state the assumption in irrationality proofs:
* Mistake: Starting the proof by squaring directly without stating the assumption.
* Fix: Always begin with: "Assume, for contradiction, that p\sqrt{p} is rational. Then p=ab\sqrt{p} = \frac{a}{b} where a,ba, b are co-prime integers."

5. Not mentioning co-primality:
* Mistake: Writing 5=pq\sqrt{5} = \frac{p}{q} without specifying that pp and qq are co-prime.
* Fix: The entire proof hinges on the co-prime condition. Without it, the contradiction at the end doesn't work. Always state it explicitly.

6. **Using HCF ×\times LCM = product for three numbers:**
* Mistake: Applying HCF(a,b,c)×LCM(a,b,c)=a×b×c\text{HCF}(a,b,c) \times \text{LCM}(a,b,c) = a \times b \times c.
* Fix: This identity only works for two numbers. For three numbers, compute HCF and LCM separately using prime factorisations.

7. Not verifying HCF and LCM:
* Mistake: Skipping the verification step.
* Fix: Always check that HCF×LCM=a×b\text{HCF} \times \text{LCM} = a \times b. This catches arithmetic errors and earns you an extra mark.

Board Exam Strategy: Scoring Full Marks in Real Numbers

Real Numbers is worth 3-6 marks in the CBSE board exam and is one of the most predictable chapters. Here is your strategy:

Expected Question Patterns:

* 1 Mark (MCQ/VSA): Identifying whether a decimal is terminating or non-terminating; finding HCF or LCM of small numbers; stating whether 6n6^n can end with digit 00.

* 2-3 Marks (SA): Finding HCF using Euclid's Division Algorithm; finding HCF and LCM using prime factorisation with verification; showing that a number is of a certain form using Euclid's Lemma.

* 3-5 Marks (LA): Proving 2\sqrt{2}, 3\sqrt{3}, or 5\sqrt{5} is irrational; proving expressions like 3+253 + 2\sqrt{5} or 535 - \sqrt{3} are irrational.

High-Priority Topics:
1. Irrationality proof of 2\sqrt{2} or 3\sqrt{3} — appears in almost every exam
2. HCF using Euclid's Algorithm — very frequently asked
3. HCF and LCM via prime factorisation with verification
4. Decimal expansion classification

Time Allocation:
- 1-mark MCQ: 1-2 minutes
- 2-3 mark SA: 4-5 minutes
- 3-5 mark proof: 6-8 minutes

Power Tips:
- For irrationality proofs, **memorise the proof of 2\sqrt{2}** word-for-word. The proofs for 3\sqrt{3}, 5\sqrt{5}, etc., are identical — just change the prime number.
- For the isolation method (proving 3+253 + 2\sqrt{5} is irrational), the proof is only 4-5 lines. Don't overthink it.
- In Euclid's Algorithm problems, show every division step — each step earns marks.
- For decimal expansion, always simplify the fraction first before checking the denominator.

Practice these on SparkEd's Real Numbers practice page to build exam-level speed.

Connections to Other Chapters

Real Numbers doesn't exist in isolation — it connects to several other chapters in meaningful ways:

Connection to Polynomials (Chapter 2): The concept of factors and divisibility from Real Numbers extends to polynomial factors. The Division Algorithm for Polynomials in Chapter 2 is the polynomial analogue of Euclid's Division Lemma.

Connection to Quadratic Equations (Chapter 4): When you solve a quadratic equation and get roots like 3+52\frac{3 + \sqrt{5}}{2}, you now know this is irrational (because 5\sqrt{5} is irrational, and a rational number plus/times an irrational number is irrational).

Connection to Coordinate Geometry (Chapter 7): The distance formula involves square roots. For instance, the distance between (0,0)(0, 0) and (1,1)(1, 1) is 2\sqrt{2}, which is irrational. This means you can't always express distances as neat fractions.

Connection to Statistics (Chapter 13): Understanding rational vs. irrational numbers helps when dealing with mean, median, and mode calculations that produce non-terminating decimals.

Understanding these connections gives you a deeper appreciation for why Real Numbers is placed as Chapter 1 — it truly is the foundation for everything that follows.

Important Formulas and Results — Quick Reference

Here is your revision cheat sheet for Chapter 1. Bookmark this section for quick review before the exam:

Euclid's Division Lemma: a=bq+ra = bq + r, where 0r<b0 \le r < b

Euclid's Division Algorithm: Repeatedly apply the lemma until remainder =0= 0. Last non-zero remainder == HCF.

Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic: Every composite number has a unique prime factorisation.

HCF by prime factorisation: Product of common primes with least powers.

LCM by prime factorisation: Product of all primes with greatest powers.

HCF-LCM relationship: HCF(a,b)×LCM(a,b)=a×b\text{HCF}(a, b) \times \text{LCM}(a, b) = a \times b

Terminating decimal condition: pq\frac{p}{q} (lowest terms) terminates     q=2m×5n\iff q = 2^m \times 5^n

**Irrationality of p\sqrt{p}:** Proved by contradiction using the lemma: if pa2p | a^2 then pap | a (for prime pp).

Key lemma: If pp is prime and pa2p | a^2, then pap | a.

Useful forms (Euclid's Lemma applications):
- Any integer: 2q2q (even) or 2q+12q+1 (odd)
- Any integer: 3q3q, 3q+13q+1, or 3q+23q+2
- Square of any integer: 3m3m or 3m+13m+1 (never 3m+23m+2)
- Cube of any integer: 9m9m, 9m+19m+1, or 9m+89m+8

Additional HOTS and Board Exam Practice Problems

These higher-order thinking problems go beyond the basic NCERT exercises and test deeper understanding. They are the types of problems that appear as 4-5 mark questions in board exams and sample papers.

HOTS Problem 1: HCF and LCM with three numbers

Problem: Find HCF and LCM of 8,9,258, 9, 25.

Solution:
8=238 = 2^3, 9=329 = 3^2, 25=5225 = 5^2

These three numbers share no common prime factor.

HCF=1\text{HCF} = 1 (co-prime numbers)

LCM=23×32×52=8×9×25=1800\text{LCM} = 2^3 \times 3^2 \times 5^2 = 8 \times 9 \times 25 = 1800

Key insight: When three numbers are pairwise co-prime, their HCF is 11 and their LCM is the product of all three.

HOTS Problem 2: Proving a product expression is composite

Problem: Show that n21n^2 - 1 is divisible by 88 for any odd positive integer nn.

Solution:
Any odd positive integer can be written as n=2k+1n = 2k + 1 for some non-negative integer kk.

n21=(2k+1)21=4k2+4k+11=4k2+4k=4k(k+1)n^2 - 1 = (2k+1)^2 - 1 = 4k^2 + 4k + 1 - 1 = 4k^2 + 4k = 4k(k+1)

Now, among any two consecutive integers kk and k+1k+1, one must be even. So k(k+1)k(k+1) is always even, say k(k+1)=2mk(k+1) = 2m.

Therefore n21=4×2m=8mn^2 - 1 = 4 \times 2m = 8m, which is divisible by 88. \square

HOTS Problem 3: Using Euclid's Lemma for divisibility

Problem: Prove that the product of three consecutive positive integers is divisible by 66.

Solution:
Let the three consecutive integers be n,n+1,n+2n, n+1, n+2.

Divisibility by 2: Among any two consecutive integers, one is even. So n(n+1)(n+2)n(n+1)(n+2) has at least one even factor, making the product divisible by 22.

Divisibility by 3: By Euclid's Lemma with b=3b = 3, any integer is of the form 3q3q, 3q+13q+1, or 3q+23q+2. Among three consecutive integers, exactly one is divisible by 33.

Since the product is divisible by both 22 and 33, and gcd(2,3)=1\gcd(2, 3) = 1, the product is divisible by 2×3=62 \times 3 = 6. \square

HOTS Problem 4: LCM-based word problem

Problem: Three bells ring at intervals of 99, 1212, and 1515 minutes. If they all ring together at 8:00 AM, when will they next ring together?

Solution:
We need the LCM of 99, 1212, and 1515.

9=329 = 3^2, 12=22×312 = 2^2 \times 3, 15=3×515 = 3 \times 5

LCM=22×32×5=4×9×5=180\text{LCM} = 2^2 \times 3^2 \times 5 = 4 \times 9 \times 5 = 180 minutes =3= 3 hours.

Answer: They will next ring together at 11:00 AM.

Real-world connection: LCM problems appear in contexts involving periodic events — traffic lights, bus schedules, bell timings, etc.

HOTS Problem 5: Proving a sum is irrational

Problem: Prove that 2+3\sqrt{2} + \sqrt{3} is irrational.

Solution:
Assume 2+3=r\sqrt{2} + \sqrt{3} = r where rr is rational.

Squaring: 2+26+3=r22 + 2\sqrt{6} + 3 = r^2
26=r252\sqrt{6} = r^2 - 5
6=r252\sqrt{6} = \frac{r^2 - 5}{2}

The right side is rational (since rr is rational), but 6\sqrt{6} is irrational (since 6=2×36 = 2 \times 3 is not a perfect square, the same proof technique as 2\sqrt{2} works).

Contradiction. Hence 2+3\sqrt{2} + \sqrt{3} is irrational. \square

Note: This problem is harder than standard NCERT problems but appears in sample papers. The trick is squaring to create a single square root term.

Previous Year Board Exam Questions — Solved

Here are actual questions from recent CBSE board exams and sample papers, solved with the level of detail expected by examiners.

Board Q1: Find HCF of 56 and 72 using Euclid's Division Algorithm

Solution (2024 Board Style):
Since 72>5672 > 56:

Step 1: 72=56×1+1672 = 56 \times 1 + 16
Step 2: 56=16×3+856 = 16 \times 3 + 8
Step 3: 16=8×2+016 = 8 \times 2 + 0

HCF(56,72)=8\text{HCF}(56, 72) = 8

Verification by prime factorisation:
56=23×756 = 2^3 \times 7, 72=23×3272 = 2^3 \times 3^2
HCF=23=8\text{HCF} = 2^3 = 8 \checkmark

Board Q2: Given that HCF(210, 55) = 5, find LCM(210, 55)

Solution:
Using HCF×LCM=a×b\text{HCF} \times \text{LCM} = a \times b:

5×LCM=210×55=115505 \times \text{LCM} = 210 \times 55 = 11550

LCM=115505=2310\text{LCM} = \frac{11550}{5} = 2310

Answer: LCM(210,55)=2310\text{LCM}(210, 55) = 2310

Board Q3: Prove that 3 + 2√5 is irrational

Solution (Full marks answer):

**We first prove that 5\sqrt{5} is irrational.**

Assume 5\sqrt{5} is rational. Then 5=pq\sqrt{5} = \frac{p}{q} where p,qp, q are co-prime and q0q \neq 0.

Squaring: p2=5q2p^2 = 5q^2 ... (i)

Since 55 divides p2p^2 and 55 is prime, 55 divides pp. [Using: if pp is prime and pa2p | a^2, then pap | a]

Let p=5kp = 5k. From (i): 25k2=5q2    q2=5k225k^2 = 5q^2 \implies q^2 = 5k^2.

So 55 divides q2    5q^2 \implies 5 divides qq.

Both p,qp, q divisible by 55. Contradicts gcd(p,q)=1\gcd(p, q) = 1.

5\therefore \sqrt{5} is irrational.

**Now we prove 3+253 + 2\sqrt{5} is irrational.**

Assume 3+253 + 2\sqrt{5} is rational, say ab\frac{a}{b} with gcd(a,b)=1\gcd(a, b) = 1.

5=a3b2b\sqrt{5} = \frac{a - 3b}{2b} — this is rational.

But 5\sqrt{5} is irrational (proved above). Contradiction.

3+25\therefore 3 + 2\sqrt{5} is irrational. \square

Examiner's note: Full marks requires proving 5\sqrt{5} irrational first (or at least stating it was proved earlier).

Boost Your Preparation with SparkEd

You've now gone through every concept, every exercise, and every problem type from Chapter 1 — Real Numbers. But reading solutions alone won't earn you full marks; you need practice.

Here's how SparkEd can help:

* Practice by Difficulty: On our Real Numbers practice page, work through problems sorted into Level 1 (basic), Level 2 (intermediate), and Level 3 (board-level). Build confidence step by step.

* AI Math Solver: Stuck on an HCF problem or can't figure out why a decimal is non-terminating? Paste your problem into our AI Solver and get a detailed, step-by-step solution with clear reasoning.

* AI Coach: Get personalised recommendations on which topics need more practice based on your performance. The Coach identifies your weak spots before the examiner does.

* Cross-Topic Practice: Real Numbers connects to Polynomials (Chapter 2), Quadratic Equations (Chapter 4), and more. Explore all chapters on our Class 10 CBSE programs page.

Head over to sparkedmaths.com and start practising today. Every problem you solve now is a mark earned on exam day!

Frequently Asked Questions

Try SparkEd Free

Visual step-by-step solutions, three difficulty levels of practice, and an AI-powered Spark coach to guide you when you are stuck. Pick your class and board to start.

Start Practicing Now